facebook1 youtube1 twitter1 instagram linkedin1 pinterest1

NOTICE:  If you are not a free registered member of the site, you will not see the photos in the forum, and you won't be able to access our premium member content. Please consider joining our community! REGISTER AND MAKE THIS BOX DISAPPEAR!

×

Pictures Posting Not Working (12 Jun 2023)

Picture uploads is again unavailable. We are working on the problem. Thanks for your patience.

Makotosun

Reducing the squish area

  • mdscott
  • mdscott's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Site Supporter
  • Site Supporter
  • Posts: 2141
  • Likes received: 1413

Reducing the squish area was created by mdscott

hello, I'm sending my cylinder head to my machinist to be surfaced so to get about .035 squish area. Obviously it will increase compression. I know a lot have done this, would I feel in the difference of power, if any when this mod is done. Any changing in jetting?
My KDX head has about 3mm of squish now.

inquiring minds what to know.
Thanks Mark
Roseville, Ca.

'03 ST1300
'75 Norton
'73 CB500K
'81 Honda CT110
'87 PW50
'64 McClane Edger
'02 Honda XR70R
26 Mar 2020 10:09 #1

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 1055
  • Likes received: 659

Replied by GFrench on topic Reducing the squish area

Which bike is this for? What is the stock squish area for this bike in comparison to the .035?

If head is milled... it will for sure increase you compression psi... if it gets to high could add some stress to the engine... but can easily be adjusted by adding an extra base gasket ect.

Proper timing will be needed to find the sweet spot and keep kick back to min.

Just speaking from my experience I have had doing this... for the 360's i have found 140 to 145 is where you would like to land and anything over is pushing it and need to make sure you give it plenty of fuel so none of those dreaded pinging sounds!

The Black Widow bike sits at 140 right now with an MX High Compression head and is dialed in.
If it ain't smokin', it's broken!
1970 RT1 360
1970 RT1 360
1971 CT1 175
1971 DT1 250
1971 DT1 250
1971 DT1 250
1971 RT1 360
1971 RT1 360 "Black Widow"
1973 RT3
1974 DT 360
1976 IT 400 / redesigned as a 75 MX400
1978 XT 500
1980 YZ 465
1984 IT 490

The following user(s) Liked this Post: mdscott
26 Mar 2020 15:40 #2

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 9686
  • Likes received: 3949

Replied by RT325 on topic Reducing the squish area

Back in "87 i got my "86 KX125 taken down pretty close by memory & certainly sharpened it up. I'm sure i went up one size in the main & one notch richer on the needle just to be safe & think i left them set at that. Thing is, at the same time i would have replaced the piston & rings & new rings always sharpens the power up on a ring dinging 125 mxer. Loved that bike & funny thing 'was' the original piston lasted well & every regular change after that had elongated the small end hole in the piston & i knew because it rattled in a certain way & could grab the pin & move it vertically. I used the original piston with new rings at times if replacements were on a 'slow boat' arrival. & original never altered. Made me think replacement [genuine box] were made of cheese. Come to think--i'm sure i started using AvGas then, so power increase with more comp was really noticeable. 34 years ago--.
26 Mar 2020 16:34 #3

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 13470
  • Likes received: 9329

Replied by MarkT on topic Reducing the squish area

If done correctly, it will make a very noticeable difference.

Water cooled is much more tolerant if compression is added... good shops that know the model will machine the combustion chamber to correct the compression if needed on that model... usually isn't needed.
1963 YG1-T, 1965 MG1-T, Allstate 250, 1970 CT1b, 1971 R5, 1973 AT3MX, 1974 TS400L, 1975 RD350, 1976 DT175C, 1976 Husqvarna 250CR, 1981 DT175G, 1988 DT50, 1990 "Super" DT50, 1991 RT180, 2017 XT250
26 Mar 2020 16:50 #4

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 9686
  • Likes received: 3949

Replied by RT325 on topic Reducing the squish area

My maths isn't good but you say .035 so is that 35 thou getting towards one mm. Not .035mm about 14 thou. I'm guessing the first one. Sorry if i sound thick lol but can be at times.
Last edit: 26 Mar 2020 16:52 by RT325.
26 Mar 2020 16:50 #5

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • mdscott
  • mdscott's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Site Supporter
  • Site Supporter
  • Posts: 2141
  • Likes received: 1413

Replied by mdscott on topic Reducing the squish area

Mr French my KDX220r is the bike i'm speaking of.
I know RB Designs and Fredette Racing along with shaving the head they configure the combustion chamber, plus they both bore and modify the carb.
I'm going the cheap route right now.
The cylinder lining was also flaking so as we speak it's being re-plated at Millennium Technologies, so that along with new piston, surfacing the head should make a fairly substantial increase in compression.
I might be heading to some desert in April to test it out.

So this is want I'm doing to maintain social distance and staying busy, I've also mowed my lawn 23 times.:ROFLOL
Thanks Mark
Roseville, Ca.

'03 ST1300
'75 Norton
'73 CB500K
'81 Honda CT110
'87 PW50
'64 McClane Edger
'02 Honda XR70R
The following user(s) Liked this Post: GFrench, Rick C., RT325, darinm
26 Mar 2020 17:32 #6

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 655
  • Likes received: 571

Replied by Pillsbury on topic Reducing the squish area

The angle of the squish area needs to be changed with the machining. More important than milling the surface. Hopefully your machinest knows 2-stroke engine technology. If not send it to these guys. www.klemmvintage.com/ Here is a GYT head machined for 180 psi and a stock one for street and 91 octane gas
1970 DT1-C Grand Prix race bike
1970 DT1-C Street tracker
1968 Honda CL90
1973 Honda CR250
1974 Honda MR-50
1966 Triumph Tiger Cub
1947 Mustang
1974 Suzuki TC185
The following user(s) Liked this Post: Swoop56
Last edit: 27 Mar 2020 08:29 by Pillsbury.
27 Mar 2020 08:28 #7

This message has an attachment image.
Please log in or register to see it.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • mdscott
  • mdscott's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Site Supporter
  • Site Supporter
  • Posts: 2141
  • Likes received: 1413

Replied by mdscott on topic Reducing the squish area


thanks Pillsbury,
just curious, other then taking the engine to him with cylinder and piston installed, how would you determine the angle of the squish area, pistons dome is arced.
Thanks Mark
Roseville, Ca.

'03 ST1300
'75 Norton
'73 CB500K
'81 Honda CT110
'87 PW50
'64 McClane Edger
'02 Honda XR70R
27 Mar 2020 08:50 #8

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 1190
  • Likes received: 374

Replied by FrankC on topic Reducing the squish area

They (klemm) require your current piston to do the mods for best performance in terms of cooling and power. But, if you can't send them the piston the work will not be as good. They are top notch in deàling with detonation issues, whether your head is listed on there or not, you'd have to call them.
Last edit: 27 Mar 2020 14:48 by FrankC.
27 Mar 2020 11:55 #9

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 13470
  • Likes received: 9329

Replied by MarkT on topic Reducing the squish area

KDX is a very modern engine compared to an old DT. Kawasaki knows how to make power. Angle may or may not need to be changed.

The biggest problem with excessive squish clearance is that there is a lot of mixture trapped there that gets "quenched" and doesn't burn. It's worthwhile to reduce that clearance. Factory doesn't do it because of mass production assembly tolerances.

If on a budget, reducing the clearance will make a significant difference in power... on squish angle, three experts will often have three different ideas of what is best. And you probably couldn't tell the difference between the three by seat of pants. Keeping in mind that Kawasaki engineers are experts too... :whistle:

Just my opinion and experience... and we all know what opinions are worth! :haha

:Buds
1963 YG1-T, 1965 MG1-T, Allstate 250, 1970 CT1b, 1971 R5, 1973 AT3MX, 1974 TS400L, 1975 RD350, 1976 DT175C, 1976 Husqvarna 250CR, 1981 DT175G, 1988 DT50, 1990 "Super" DT50, 1991 RT180, 2017 XT250
The following user(s) Liked this Post: FrankC, mdscott
27 Mar 2020 22:56 #10

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: yamadminMakotosunDEETVinnieJames Hart