facebook1 youtube1 twitter1 instagram linkedin1 pinterest1

NOTICE:  If you are not a free registered member of the site, you will not see the photos in the forum, and you won't be able to access our premium member content. Please consider joining our community! REGISTER AND MAKE THIS BOX DISAPPEAR!

×

Pictures Posting Not Working (12 Jun 2023)

Picture uploads is again unavailable. We are working on the problem. Thanks for your patience.

Makotosun

Front suspension fork upgrade?

  • Posts: 1082
  • Likes received: 915

Replied by Rick C. on topic Front suspension fork upgrade?

Or these 79' front axle I found cleaning the garage. Again ugh.





06 Oct 2020 17:41 #11

This message has attachments images.
Please log in or register to see it.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 734
  • Likes received: 169

Replied by bluntz465 on topic Front suspension fork upgrade?

Again just what is expected? If the machine is to be raced vmx then i think only 4 inches of travel is allowed. However if he just wants to stop loosing his dentures then a swap is in his interest.
1957 Cushman Eagle 1969 Honda 90 ATC 1969 Honda CB250
1973 Yamaha AT3 1974 Kawasaki KH440 1974 Honda XR75
1975 Suzuki TS75 1975 Kawasaki GreenStreak 90 1975 Suzuki GT550
1975 Suzuki TS250 1976 Suzuki GT550 1976 Indian Chief
1976 Yamaha YZ80 1978 Yamaha IT175 1980 Suzuki GS550
1982 Yamaha IT465J
The following user(s) Liked this Post: CincinnatiKid
06 Oct 2020 18:44 #12

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 138
  • Likes received: 198

Replied by YZBill on topic Front suspension fork upgrade?

I have swapped forks on a 77 Honda CR125 (AHRMA P-V Historic Class) for the forks and front wheel off an 82 Honda XL250. I did shorten the travel of the forks, so the bike would remain “legal” for the class, but upgraded them with Race Tech cartridge emulators and fork springs. It now has a full 9” of travel up front and 7” in back with Works shocks. Another swap I did was putting 31mm forks from an 83 Honda CR80 onto an 83 Honda XR100. That one required using the triple clamps from a 77 Honda MR175. Damping rod forks are pretty simple to take apart and upgrade with emulators.
The following user(s) Liked this Post: bluntz465, Bigdog302
06 Oct 2020 19:52 #13

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 734
  • Likes received: 169

Replied by bluntz465 on topic Front suspension fork upgrade?

This is just what I am trying to point out but you seem to have left out a large detail. The need for a fork swap to increase travel. The emulators dont do that by themselves alone correct ?
1957 Cushman Eagle 1969 Honda 90 ATC 1969 Honda CB250
1973 Yamaha AT3 1974 Kawasaki KH440 1974 Honda XR75
1975 Suzuki TS75 1975 Kawasaki GreenStreak 90 1975 Suzuki GT550
1975 Suzuki TS250 1976 Suzuki GT550 1976 Indian Chief
1976 Yamaha YZ80 1978 Yamaha IT175 1980 Suzuki GS550
1982 Yamaha IT465J
06 Oct 2020 20:54 #14

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 138
  • Likes received: 198

Replied by YZBill on topic Front suspension fork upgrade?


For vintage class (pre-75), suspension travel is limited to 7” front, 4” rear. Yet some forks do not have 7” of travel. Also some people upgrade to larger diameter fork tubes.

Emulators offer a way to control compression damping. Basically you modify the damping rod to increase oil flow. The emulator is a spring loaded valve that sits on top of the damping rod. Compression damping is controlled by the preload and the spring on the emulator. Rebound damping can then be more easily tuned with different weight oils.
The following user(s) Liked this Post: MarkT, nhsteve
06 Oct 2020 21:32 #15

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 13479
  • Likes received: 9340

Replied by MarkT on topic Front suspension fork upgrade?

Bike has to remain balanced in my experience. If you put long forks on front then you need long shocks on back.

Swingarm angle gets too steep... rear of bike "jacks up" under acceleration and "squats" under braking. Rear traction sucks under power. Chain tensioning becomes an issue. It just doesn't work well if you go beyond a modest increase... maybe an inch or two... on these old bikes. Pre 79 monoshock forks are a good choice as mentioned. You can put emulators in them too.

Just good shocks (stock-ish length) and improved stock forks is a HUGE improvement and you don't mess up geometry.
1963 YG1-T, 1965 MG1-T, Allstate 250, 1970 CT1b, 1971 R5, 1973 AT3MX, 1974 TS400L, 1975 RD350, 1976 DT175C, 1976 Husqvarna 250CR, 1981 DT175G, 1988 DT50, 1990 "Super" DT50, 1991 RT180, 2017 XT250
The following user(s) Liked this Post: Bigdog302, nhsteve, YZBill
06 Oct 2020 22:19 #16

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • RT3Sam
  • RT3Sam's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Premium Member
  • Premium Member
  • Posts: 133
  • Likes received: 71

Replied by RT3Sam on topic Front suspension fork upgrade?

Ok, just to clarify.... I'm not doing any triples or even jumping my RT3. The goal is to have decent suspension for running enduro or harescramble type trails and not get beat up. Don't get me wrong, the rider needs to do a lot of work to get better himself, but a suspension upgrade would help me with control of the bike.
07 Oct 2020 08:13 #17

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 138
  • Likes received: 198

Replied by YZBill on topic Front suspension fork upgrade?


Not sure what, if anything, you have done to the forks already. Sometimes just taking them completely apart, cleaning the internals, installing new springs matched to your weight and ability, new seals and fresh fork oil is all you need to improve handling. Many older manuals call for using ATF in the forks. It works, but not as good as fork oil which comes in several viscosities, from 2 to 20.

The compression and rebound damping is controlled by the damping rods and can be only be tuned by the fork oil viscosity and volume of fork oil. Cartridge emulators allow for more precise tuning of the compression damping. This in turn allows for better control of rebound damping using different weight fork oils.

If your compression and rebound damping are too fast it will feel like you’re riding a pogo stick and you’ll have less control the faster you ride. If your compression and rebound damping are too slow you end up with what’s called packing. The forks become hydro-locked and do not absorb small bumps at speed.

While emulators are a wonderful item to have, for fine tuning, your best bang for your buck comes from having the correct fork springs for your weight/ability. Essentially you want the forks riding high in their stroke and let the damping soak up the terrain. Most fork springs are sacked out leaving you with much less travel.
The following user(s) Liked this Post: bluntz465, Bigdog302, RT3Sam
07 Oct 2020 11:08 #18

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 13479
  • Likes received: 9340

Replied by MarkT on topic Front suspension fork upgrade?

Yamaha used very soft fork springs on most models too... Even on a "competition" model like the IT175.

I agree that getting the correct single rate springs for your weight and riding style will make a big difference.
1963 YG1-T, 1965 MG1-T, Allstate 250, 1970 CT1b, 1971 R5, 1973 AT3MX, 1974 TS400L, 1975 RD350, 1976 DT175C, 1976 Husqvarna 250CR, 1981 DT175G, 1988 DT50, 1990 "Super" DT50, 1991 RT180, 2017 XT250
The following user(s) Liked this Post: RT3Sam
07 Oct 2020 12:13 #19

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 577
  • Likes received: 438

Replied by Capt.Dave on topic Front suspension fork upgrade?

I use `75 MX250B forks on my trackmaster honda. They work great.
The following user(s) Liked this Post: MarkT, Bigdog302, RT3Sam
07 Oct 2020 14:16 #20

This message has an attachment image.
Please log in or register to see it.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: yamadminMakotosunDEETVinnieJames Hart